DefenceSynergia is grateful to Defence UK for allowing DS to publish their short discussion paper entitled ‘DEFENCEUK Paper Aug 2026 Britain needs an Iron Dome’. This is because DS firmly believes that Integrated Air Defence of the UK is critical yet totally lacking.

Indeed, DS has briefed on the parlous lack of anti-ballistic and anti-hypersonic capability in UK to successive Defence Committee chairmen over several years and inputted to House of Commons Committees on the same. We feel the Defence UK paper might benefit from emphasising that the ‘proxy war’ may have already morphed into Real War. Yet UK is only committing resources in future financial years while Russia has been adapting their factories, people and capabilities for over 4 years.

DS would also make some play of the Irish Republics responsibilities for regional AD. The direction of an attack might include the west over Ireland where currently ABO protocols, sensors and ‘warning’ indicators are extremely limited, complex or non-existent.

The value of this Defence UK paper is that it lists the limited defences currently available. However, without enough people and resources our present Armed Forces are struggling and public education/information is scanty and over optimistic at best. Therefore, DS agrees with Defence UK that a ‘national discussion’ is urgently required - time is running out.

The full Defence UK paper can be found here but below DS has produced a précis version.

Précis Version of DefenceUK Discussion Paper

The UK urgently needs a modern Integrated Air and Missile Defence (IAMD) system, often referred to as layered air defence, due to increasing threats from Russia.

1. The Russian Threat

• Missiles: Russia possesses a range of cruise and ballistic missiles (e.g., Kalibr, Kh-101, Kinzhal, Iskander) capable of striking the UK from various platforms and locations, including submarines, ships, aircraft, and mobile launchers.

• Drones: Russia can deploy long-range attack drones (e.g., Geran/Shahed) and potentially smuggle short-range drones into the UK for clandestine attacks.

• Stockpiles: Russian missile production is ongoing, with evidence of recent manufacturing, though exact stockpile sizes are unknown.

2. Scandinavian Allies' Defences

The Scandinavians are highly likely to be the countries over which any missile attack from Russia will fly so their capabilities are of significance to the UK.

• Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland all operate modern surface-to-air missile systems (NASAMS, Patriot, Aster SAMP/T, IRIS-T, David’s Sling), but only Sweden currently has anti-ballistic missile capability.

• Coverage Limitations: These systems cannot guarantee interception of all missiles en route to the UK, and allies may prioritize their own defence over the UK's.

3. The UK's Current Defences

• Early Warning: The RAF has only three E-7 Wedgetail AWACS aircraft, which are vulnerable and insufficient in number.

• Long/Medium-Range Missiles: The UK lacks long-range anti-ballistic missile systems (like Arrow 3 or THAAD) and has only limited medium-range capability via six Type 45 destroyers, which often have low availability.

• Short-Range Missiles: The Army’s Sky Sabre (CAMM) systems are few and only protect specific high-value targets. Very short-range systems (Martlet, Starstreak) are intended for battlefield use, not national defence. The UK has no anti-aircraft guns.

4. Critical Assets Needing Defence

• Energy Infrastructure: Gas terminals, LNG terminals, power stations, electricity interconnectors, wind farms, and nuclear power stations.

• Defence Infrastructure: Military bases, shipyards, naval bases, radar stations, and intelligence headquarters.

• Other Targets: Government buildings, financial centres, airports, hospitals, and cultural sites.

5. Summary and Risks

• The UK is highly vulnerable to missile and drone attacks, with insufficient defences and limited ability to retaliate against non-nuclear threats.

• Reliance on allies, especially the USA, is risky as their support is not guaranteed and their own resources may be stretched.

• Without urgent investment in IAMD, the UK risks sustained attacks on critical infrastructure and civilian morale, potentially forcing political leaders into unfavorable negotiations.

Immediate action is needed to address these vulnerabilities, as current UK defences are inadequate for the evolving threat landscape.

With thanks to our friends in Defence UK.

Reach Out Today!